Area Based Management Model
3.0 EVALUATION OF ABM MODELS
3.1 Area Based Management (ABM) can be implemented in two ways:
3.1.1 Hard-Core ABM (functionally decentralized):
It is when a Municipality is divided into small entities (Municipalities)which are fully functional but at the same time, are centrally controlled. Areas or entities receive instructions from the central office and sometimes from different Strategic Business Units (departments). This type of management usually creates contradictions and conflict with the central structures in control. There is also too much duplication and huge financial implication. Hard-Core ABM operates the same way as the previous Apartheid Bantustans or homelands.
3.1.1.1 The advantages of Hard-Core are as follows:
Most services are functionally organised per area. Offices set up within closer proximity to Communities. One stop shop for services, payments and enquiries.
3.1.1.2 The disadvantages of Hard-Core are as follows:
Silo mentality leading to conflict and contradictions operations Duplication of services, personnel across areas. Expensive owing to above. No uniformity of services, standards, procedures
3.1.2 Soft-Core ABM (Community Interaction):
Soft Core ABM does not control Strategic Business Units (departments). This approach is about community facilitation, increasing participation, conflict resolution, community advocacy, the monitoring and speeding of services delivery. ABM does not dictate to departments with regard to the implementation of their projects but can advise against fragmented service delivery. It can share information with strategic business units and community at large. ABM will align stake-holders plans with those of the council through Community Based Planning methodology and other methodologies.
3.1.2.1 The advantages of the Soft-Core are as follows:
Integrated service delivery. Offices set up within closer proximity to Communities. One stop shop to services, payments and enquiries. Inexpensive in terms of services and personnel. Encourages Community participation and conflict resolution. Uniformity of service and standards. Less bureaucracy and red-tape. Easy to provide regular feed-back to people. Not restrictive to a particular function.
3.1.2.2 Disadvantages of the Soft-Core
Not popular with officials seen as informers/police for Councillors and Communities. Viewed with suspicion by officials who may fear being supervised. Non co-operation from Strategic Business Units. New section whose functions/responsibilities may be misunderstood.